La comisión europea ahorra dinero con el software libre

La Comisión Europea ha publicado su Estudio sobre el impacto económico del software de código abierto en innovación, etc. realizado en seis organizaciones públicas en seis paises de la Unión europea. De la mudanza de dichas organizaciones a sistemas de software libre, han sacado las siguientes conclusiones:

-la transición cuesta dinero a corto plazo (en instalación y entrenamiento) pero es un gasto mínimo y recuperable en menos de un año.

-la transición ahorra dinero a medio y largo plazo en costes de software y licencias.

-la transición de sistemas propietarios a OpenOffice apenas ha sido detectada por los funcionarios, por lo que el coste inicial, tanto económico como de tiempo y esfuerzo, ha sido cero.

Hay algo que decir acerca de la línea de comandos como interfaz universal: los iconos cambian pero las palabras no. Aprender a trabajar con un formato que nos resulta tan natural como el lenguaje no sólo es más fácil, además nos evita tener que desaprender lo aprendido cada vez que una compañía llega con un "concepro revolucionario" para el escritorio. Los expertos dicen que costará millones a las empresas enseñar a sus trabajadores a utilizar el nuevo microsoft word.

Curiosos, interesados y angloparlantes en general podrán leer el estudio completo en html y PDF. Los no tan curiosos pero sí un poquito, pueden leer las conclusiones originales (que son cuatro parrafitos de nada) después de pinchar en "leer más". (via groklaw)

Conclusions. Our analysis has been performed on six organizations in different European countries. The majority of them are public bodies. The organizations have followed different types of migration on the base of their context.

We have investigated the costs of migration, and the cost of ownership of the old and the new solution differentiating them between the costs of purchasing and the costs of ownership of the software solutions. Special attention has been put on the intangible nature of the costs. Costs have been classified in categories defined trough existing studies and selected by a top down approach called Goal Question Metric. This instrument has been also used to define the questionnaires used to collect the data.

Our findings show that, in almost all the cases, a transition toward open source reports of savings on the long term – costs of ownership of the software products.

Costs to migrate to an open solution are relevant and an organization needs to consider an extra effort for this. However these costs are temporary and mainly are budgeted in less than one year. The major factor of cost of the new solution – even in the case that the open solution is mixed with closed software – is costs for peer or ad hoc training. These are the best example of intangible costs that often are not foreseen in a transition. On the other hand not providing a specific training may cause and adverse attitude toward the new technology. Fortunately those costs are limited in time and are not strictly linked to the nature of the new software adopted.

We also investigated the productivity of the employees in using Microsoft office and OpenOffice.org. Office suites are widely used and are a good test bed and representative for a comparison on issues like effort and time spent in the daily routine of work. Delays in the task deliveries may have a bigger impact than costs on the organization's management. Our findings report no particular delays or lost of time in the daily work due to the use of OpenOffice.org.